0003 -
THE WAR FOR ORIGINALITY: POST-FLOOD
--FILED: 2025.04.18 / REF.ID: 0003-RA--
“When people are offered more options, they tend to make worse decisions, take longer to make them, and feel less satisfied afterward.”
THE GREAT DEMOCRATIZATION BECAME THE GREAT DILUTION
The scale of AI image generation has reached unprecedented levels. By mid-2023, Midjourney alone had created over 964 million images since its 2022 launch. When combined with other major platforms—DALL·E, Stable Diffusion, and Adobe Firefly—more than 15 billion AI images have been generated in total, with an estimated 34 million new images created daily. To put this in perspective: by some estimates, it took over a century for humanity to create 15 billion photographs—a volume AI matched in under two years.
- 34+ million images created daily across all platforms
- Stable Diffusion: 12.6 billion images (80% of total)
- Midjourney: 2.5 million daily, 20+ million users
- Adobe Firefly: 1 billion images in first 3 months
Sources: Everypixel Research; Brookings Institution; Market.us Industry Report
This abundance created an unexpected psychological burden. What behavioral economists call "choice overload" has restructured the entire creative economy. The infinite became overwhelming. The accessible became worthless.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF INFINITE CHOICE
The seminal research by Iyengar and Lepper (2000) demonstrated that consumers faced with extensive options experience decision paralysis and post-choice regret. Their findings, replicated across diverse markets, identify four conditions that trigger overload:
- High complexity: Difficulty distinguishing between options
- Uncertain preferences: Lack of clear evaluation criteria
- Unclear goals: Ambiguous desired outcomes
- High decision cost: Perceived risk of choosing poorly
Today's AI art market exhibits all four conditions simultaneously. The result: widespread decision avoidance and a flight toward simplified, pre-curated options.
THE MARKET RESPONSE TO OVERPRODUCTION
Standard economic models predict that increased supply leads to lower prices, all else being equal. However, in creative and experiential markets, abundance doesn't just lower prices—it often fuels the rise of premium segments that thrive on curation and exclusivity.
This phenomenon occurs because information abundance creates filtering challenges for consumers. When faced with countless options, buyers increasingly rely on price as a heuristic for quality assessment and use premium purchases to signal taste, status, or access to curated experiences.
Source: Kapferer, J-N. (2012). "Abundant rarity: The key to luxury growth." Business Horizons, 55(5), 453-462.
Case Study: Luxury Craftsmanship Industries
Hermès: Maintains 60% gross margins through artificial scarcity (quota buying system) and traditional craftsmanship emphasis, with Birkin bags commanding $10,000+ despite global brand expansion.
Chanel: Since 1985, acquired 30+ artisan workshops to preserve traditional crafts while scaling production, allowing premium pricing through authenticity narratives.
Italian Luxury Industry: Merges local artisanal practices with industrial efficiency, using tradition as both authenticity marker and premium pricing justification—craftsmanship commands 300-500% premiums over mass-produced equivalents.
Sources: Research on Hermès pricing strategy (2023); Preserving Traditional Craftsmanship Within Luxury Manufacturing; The experience of luxury craftsmanship research (2022)This premium positioning strategy appears across creative industries experiencing technological abundance:
- Watchmaking: Patek Philippe restricts production while emphasizing hand-crafted techniques, maintaining exclusivity despite growing global luxury demand
- Artisanal Markets: Traditional craftsmanship creates 300-500% premiums through emphasis on authenticity, sustainability, and personalization
- Fashion: Limited-edition culture and "hunger marketing" have become dominant economic models, turning scarcity into competitive advantage
Key Insight:
"The market's response to creative abundance isn't uniform price compression, but rather segmentation where premium positioning becomes more valuable as a filtering mechanism. This phenomenon challenges traditional supply-demand models and reveals the complex role of perceived scarcity in value creation."
Source: Rebel ArchiveSource: Kapferer, J-N. & Valette-Florence, P. (2016). "Beyond rarity: the paths of luxury desire." Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5037-5043.
THE PROFESSIONAL RESPONSE
A landmark 2024 study published in PNAS Nexus analyzed over 4 million AI-assisted artworks from more than 50,000 artists. The researchers found that while the average novelty of AI-generated images declined as output soared, the most impactful and highly valued works were those that artists carefully curated and refined.
• Selective curation drives higher commercial success
• Impact comes from filtering, not volume
• Human judgment remains primary value driver
• Quality over quantity correlates with market position
Source: Zhou & Lee, "Human-AI Collaboration in Creative Industries," PNAS Nexus, 2024
"The artists who successfully explore novel ideas and filter model outputs for coherence benefit the most from AI tools, underscoring the pivotal role of human ideation and artistic filtering in determining an artist's success with generative AI tools."
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should."
In the era of generative AI, the same warning echoes through the art world. The shift is no longer about capability—but discernment. The question is no longer “Can I make this?” It’s “Should this exist?”
THE POST-FLOOD PARADIGM
The creative economy is experiencing a fundamental inversion. In an environment of unlimited supply, primary value shifts from production capacity to selection authority. Curation becomes co-creation. Editorial judgment becomes artistic medium.
NEW VALUE HIERARCHIES
Market analysis reveals three emerging value structures in post-flood creative markets:
- Provenance over Production: Documentation of creative process and decision-making valued above final output
- Constraint as Signal: Self-imposed limitations indicate intentionality and commitment
- Curation as Co-Creation: Selection decisions treated as collaborative artistic act
THE ART OF LESS
In a world where anyone can generate infinite images with a few prompts, limiting output becomes an act of defiance. The new avant-garde is not endless generation or algorithmic aesthetics, but fierce selection—a return to taste, authorship, and consequence.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CREATIVE ECONOMY
Structural Market Changes
- Intermediary Evolution: Platforms emphasizing quality filters capture disproportionate market share
- Professional Stratification: Clear separation emerging between "generators" and "selectors"
- Premium Positioning: Organizations with voluntary output constraints command higher prices
- Decision-Making as Service: Curatorial expertise becomes primary economic value
The data suggests a fundamental reorganization of creative labor. In markets characterized by artificial abundance, economic value concentrates not around production capability, but around judgment, taste, and the willingness to make—and defend—definitive choices.
The creative industries are experiencing their most significant structural shift since industrialization. The question is no longer what can be made, but what deserves to survive the flood.